|
|
Post by Mr. Daniel on May 13, 2013 8:55:43 GMT -5
Why We Fightwas made during the Bush administration. How might it be updated for the Obama administration?
|
|
|
|
Post by ryanmcguire on May 23, 2013 12:24:57 GMT -5
It might be updated in a totally different way for the Obama administration. First of all, this movie was totally left-winged biased toward hating on the Bush administration. It criticized nope Cheney for being involved in a scandal that made the war industry make millions off of the Iraq War, and that this was the reason we went to war. I had never heard of such a thing until this movie, so it shows its bias. Anyway, I think that this movie would praise Obama for trying to pull out the troops in these countries. Based on the movie that I watched, and saying this would make the producers of this film happy.
|
|
|
|
Post by meganrux on May 23, 2013 14:20:40 GMT -5
To go along with what Ryan said, because our vice president has not had a scandal and because Obama is reversing that which Bush set in place, the movie would be more praising of the President of the United States. To continue, Ryan, what besides the obvious opposites would make the producers of the film happy? Is there anything in addition to Biden's lack of scandal and Obama's attempts to undo Bush's actions that would change the view of the film.
|
|
|
|
Post by ryanmcguire on May 23, 2013 14:25:07 GMT -5
I think that the producers of the film would be happy that Obama has actually started to pull troops out slowly but surely. Since this is why they were mad that troops were sent over to the middle east in the first place, I think that they would be very happy with this. I also think there are other things that would change the view that this film presents. For example, even though the views of this film are with those of Obama's, I think that the recent terrorist attacks such as the one in Boston could possibly change these producers beliefs to those of wanting troops in the middle east to make sure terrorists like these are being monitored so something like the Boston massacre doesn't happen again.
|
|
|
|
Post by micahthegreat on May 23, 2013 14:33:07 GMT -5
Ryan, what specificly do you mean by "Since this is why they were mad that troops were sent over to the middle east in the first place"? You are not very clear on this. Could you explain.
|
|
|
|
Post by ryanmcguire on May 23, 2013 14:42:32 GMT -5
What I mean by this is that the producers of the film seemed to believe that they were upset that troops were sent to the middle east because they thought that these troops were sent over there in a conspiracy with the government to help out war companies.
|
|
